Comments on: .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Revisited /2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/ Thu, 16 Mar 2017 16:29:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.14 By: Martin /2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1830 Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:42:00 +0000 /?p=47#comment-1830 If curious about the performance of some of the most popular IOC containers take a look http://www.iocbattle.com.

]]> By: Andrey Shchekin /2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1679 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:53:19 +0000 /?p=47#comment-1679 Yes, I think while MEF is not just an IoC framework, it does contain an implementation of basic IoC framework. So I should add it to the review, will probably do later.

]]> By: wcoenen /2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1677 Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:50:09 +0000 /?p=47#comment-1677 There is now also the managed extensions framework, which will be included in .NET 4.0 as the System.ComponentModel.Composition namespace.

There is a lot of handwaving about MEF not being an IoC framework but I'm pretty sure that it belongs in this list.

]]> By: Comparing .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Part 2 » Blog Archive » I Think It’s Interesting /2009/10/12/net-di-ioc-frameworks-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1643 Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:33:26 +0000 /?p=47#comment-1643 […] .NET DI (IoC) Frameworks, Revisited […]

]]>